Barr v. City of Omaha
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Keysor, J.
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, C. J.
This action was brought by the plaintiffs in error against the city of Omaha to recover damages to their lot because of street improvements. There was judgment for the city, dismissing the action, and plaintiffs prosecute error.
The plaintiffs are, and they have been for several years, the owners of lot 20 of the S. E. Rodgers’ Oklahoma Addition to the city of Omaha, and lived in the residence situate upon said lot. The premises are situated on the east side of Thirteenth street, and south of Blaine street in said *343city. In March, 1889, the city of Omaha passed an ordinance establishing the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Heldt v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
- Carr v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
- City of Omaha v. KramerNebraska Supreme Court · 1889
- Clough v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
- Lowe v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Town of Eutaw v. BotnickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Carter White Lead Co. v. KinlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. OysterNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
- Blondel v. BolanderNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
- Jacobs v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.