Lingelbach v. Luckenbach
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeals from judgments of the circuit court for Oconto county: W. B. Quinlan, Circuit Judge. These are appeals from three separate judgments. The actions were commenced separately and tried together and three separate judgments entered. The original complaint of Minnie Lingelbach sets forth false and fraudulent representations relied upon by the plaintiff respecting stock which the defendant had for sale in a corporation known as the Home Stores Company.
Read the full summary
Appeals from judgments of the circuit court for Oconto county: W. B. Quinlan, Circuit Judge. These are appeals from three separate judgments. The actions were commenced separately and tried together and three separate judgments entered. The original complaint of Minnie Lingelbach sets forth false and fraudulent representations relied upon by the plaintiff respecting stock which the defendant had for sale in a corporation known as the Home Stores Company. The complaint was amended by adding the following: “That if the said defendant A. H. Luckenbach could procure any of the shares of the…
1Opinion of the CourtKerwin, J.
The theory of the respondents is that they were induced to purchase the stock in the Home Stores *484Company upon the false and fraudulent representations of the defendant A. H. Luckenbach to the effect that the stock was of great value and was, in fact, of higher market value than its face; that the merchandise sold by said company was sold at a profit of 100 per cent.; that the investment in the stock was an excellent undertaking which had never paid less than ten per cent, dividends; that said A. H. Luck-enbach had invested a large amount of cash in said stock; that he was not personally…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hankwitz v. BarrettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Trenholm v. KloepperNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
- Korrer v. MaddenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Vohland v. GelhaarWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
- Bur v. BongWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Corp. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Kunzmann v. PetteysSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
- Pyskoty v. SobusiakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Zlindra v. ZlindraWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
- Pierce v. RothwellWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.