Legal Opinion

Kunzmann v. Petteys

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 3, 1923No. 10,512; No. 10,513PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

By consent of the parties, causes Nos. 10,512 and 10,513, in which the defendant is the same, and the plaintiffs are different, were consolidated for hearing below and also here. The one opinion is applicable to both, and the decision in each case is the same.

The sole question for decision is one of law, raised by the general demurrer to the amended complaint, which the court sustained and dismissed the action. The plaintiff charged in his pleading that the defendant Petteys, at the time cashier and one of the principal stockholders of the Weldon Valley State Bank, was engaged in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnston v. . TraskNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Mulford v. Torrey Exploration Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  3. Trenholm v. KloepperNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Green v. BrookinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Clement v. RoweSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Morrison v. GoodspeedSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
  2. Oklahoma Natural Gas Corp. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Pyskoty v. SobusiakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  4. Weinman Ex Rel. Centrix Liquidating Trust v. Allison Payment Systems, LLC (In Re Centrix Financial, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2010
  5. Pierce v. RothwellWyoming Supreme Court · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API