Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Connecticut Insurance Placement Facility

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 10, 1984No. 12112PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParskey, J.

This appeal concerns the applicability of the immunity provisions of General Statutes § 49-73a et seq. to the payment by an insurance company of fire loss proceeds to a municipality for outstanding municipal taxes owed by the insured.

The plaintiff insured1 brought an action against the defendant to recover insurance proceeds and damages arising out of a fire loss with respect to certain real property located at 963 Capitol Avenue in the city of Hartford. The defendant filed three special defenses, the thrust of which essentially alleged the same thing, namely, that it had paid the proceeds to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Austin, Nichols Co., Inc. v. GilmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  2. State v. KoenigSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  3. Mizla v. DepaloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Zarillo v. PeckConnecticut Superior Court · 1976

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Walker v. LombardoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  2. Masko v. Town of WallingfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Tucker v. Connecticut Insurance Placement FacilityConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  4. Connecticut Fair P. v. High Plains Land, No. Cv99 015 60 99 S (Jan. 7, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002
  5. Liberty Mutual Life Insurance v. TuckerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API