Legal Opinion
Zarillo v. Peck
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided April 9, 1976No. FILE NO. 210PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParskey, J.
The issue raised by the first assignment of error and the principal issue involved in this appeal is whether a writ, summons and com plaint received by a sheriff, by mail, had been “personally delivered” within the meaning of § 52-593a 1 of the General Statutes. We hold that it has been so delivered and we reverse. The second assignment of error was not briefed and is considered abandoned. State v. Keeler, 164 Conn. 42, 43. The third assignment was withdrawn during argument.
This is a negligence action. The accident which gave rise to the action occurred on October 24,1970. According to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Clegg v. BishopSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- State v. KoenigSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- State v. KeelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Hannon v. BramleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gianetti v. Connecticut Newspapers Publishing Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Tucker v. Connecticut Insurance Placement FacilitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Cartsounis v. Rosenstein, No. Cv 00 0176589 (Mar. 6, 2003)Connecticut Superior Court · 2003
- Gillette v. Knaus Development Company, No. Cv99-0155985s (Sep. 28, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
- Johnson v. PreleskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.