Legal Opinion
Mizla v. Depalo
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 27, 1981PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
This is an action involving the Connecticut Marketable Record Title Act, General Statutes §§ 47-33b through 47-331. The plaintiff challenged, in the first count of his complaint, 1 the validity of a notice of claim filed in the Norwich land records by the defendants pursuant to General Statutes § 47-33f (a). 2 Both parties filed motions for summary judgment on this issue. 3 Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff on both motions. The defendants have appealed from the final judgment rendered on the summary judgment motions.
The defendants are the owners in fee simple of a parcel of land…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stoni v. WasickiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Merwin v. MorrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
3Cited by12 opinions
- Morton Buildings, Inc. v. BannonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Home Oil Co. v. ToddSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Il Giardino, LLC v. Belle Haven Land Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Branch v. OcchioneroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- SLI International Corp. v. CrystalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.