Legal Opinion
Masko v. Town of Wallingford
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 11, 2001No. AC 21031PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FREEDMAN, J.
The defendant second injury fund (fund) appeals from the decision of the workers’ compensation review board (board) affirming the decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner). The commissioner had found that the renotification to the fund by the defendant town of Wallingford (town) of its intent to pursue the transfer of the plaintiffs case was timely pursuant to Public Acts 1995, No. 95-277, § 3 (e) (P.A. 95-277), codified in 1997 at General *278Statutes § 31-349 (e).1 We agree that the renotification was timely and, accordingly, affirm the decision of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gaudio v. Griffin Health Services Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Davis v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Badolato v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Bittle v. Commissioner of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Cece v. Felix Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Scoville v. Shop-Rite Supermarkets, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Kindl v. Department of Social ServicesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Anastasio v. Mail Contractors of America, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002