Legal Opinion

Walker v. Lombardo

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 2, 1984No. (2405)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal 1 arises out of the granting of the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiffs in the amount of $3800, the sum paid by the plaintiffs as a down payment on the purchase of realty owned by the defendants.

The issue on appeal, as stated by the parties, is whether the trial court erred in concluding that the plaintiffs were unable to receive a particular mortgage commitment and, as provided in a sales agreement of the parties, were therefore entitled to a return of their deposit. There is, however, a subsidiary and more basic issue. That is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  2. Donna Mack v. Cape Elizabeth School BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
  3. McDermott v. New Haven Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Tucker v. Connecticut Insurance Placement FacilitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Doty v. Shawmut BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  2. Matos v. OrtizConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  3. Campanaro v. Jenkins, No. Cv 98-85603 (Apr. 15, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999
  4. Coccoloni v. Mtd Corporation, No. Cv94-314826s (Jan. 10, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
  5. Debernardo v. Pinewood Lake Assoc., No. Cv93 030 78 41 S (Sep. 27, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API