Legal Opinion

Arsenio v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 26, 1920No. Civ. No. 2191PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

PREWETT, P. J., pro tem.

The appellant sues the respondent to recover $2,037 claimed as a balance due upon a sale of 223 tons of hay at an agreed price of $18 per ton. It is averred and admitted that the hay was delivered to respondent. The. respondent in his answer, among other things, admits and avers “that said plaintiff agreed that said hay would be well baled and cured and in good merchantable condition when delivered to defendant. That thereafter . . . the said plaintiff did deliver to the defendant 223 tons of barley and alfalfa hay at El Rico Station, in Kings County, California, but…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Guidery v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. De Pedrorena v. HotchkissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Klein Norton Co. v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Dugan v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. Wagner v. ShaponaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Hooke v. Great Western Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. Haberman v. SawallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API