Legal Opinion
Hooke v. Great Western Lumber Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 27, 1921No. Civ. No. 3965PublishedCited by 12 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. George H. Cabaniss, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.
This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action to recover damages for breach of an agreement to deliver spruce cannery shook.
With reference to this agreement, the court found:
“That plaintiff and defendant entered into a mutual agreement in writing in words and figures as follows:
“ ‘San Francisco, Cal,, April 11, 1917.
‘Mr. G. H. Hooke,
“ ‘San Francisco, Cal.
“ ‘Dear Sir:
“ ‘This will confirm our acceptance of an order for approximately 160,000 6/1 gallon spruce cannery shook at $11.75 per 100 F. O. B. Watsonville.
“ ‘It is further understood and agreed that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Guidery v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Gardiner v. McDonoghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Arsenio v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Beach v. CovillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854
- Iroquois Furnace Co. v. Bignall Hardware Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by12 opinions
- Klein Norton Co. v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Grant v. the Aerodraulics Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Dugan v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Wagner v. ShaponaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Epstein v. WaasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.