Legal Opinion
Haberman v. Sawall
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 11, 1925No. Docket No. 5018PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESTON, J., pro tem.
Plaintiffs commenced this action to recover from defendants the sum of $675, alleged to be due under a certain written agreement between plaintiffs and defendants.
The ease was tried by the court without a jury. Judgment went for the defendants; from this judgment plaintiffs prosecute this appeal.
The facts of the case are these: On September 15, 1919, the plaintiff, Jacob Haberman, entered into a written contract with R. S. Elliott and Ethel M. Elliott, his wife, for the purchase of certain lands owned by them in Fresno County, California, for $14,000, payable as follows:…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Guidery v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Tompkins v. DavidowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Hooke v. Great Western Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921
- Arsenio v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
3Cited by11 opinions
- Klein Norton Co. v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Grant v. the Aerodraulics Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Dugan v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Wagner v. ShaponaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- San Gabriel Valley Ready-Mixt v. CasillasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.