De Pedrorena v. Hotchkiss
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
This appeal is from the judgment, without a bill of exceptions, and practically by defendant Hotchkiss alone; for although the notice of appeal is signed by Hotchkiss as attorney for the defendants, the other defendant filed a disclaimer in the lower court, and no point is made here in his behalf.
Objection is made by respondent to the jurisdiction of the court to entertain the appeal, on the ground that it does not appear that the notice of appeal was served. The rules of this court provide that “ exceptions or objections to the transcript, statement, the bond or undertaking on…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Douglas v. DakinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by9 opinions
- Woods v. HydeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Arsenio v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Brown v. CantyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Espinosa v. StuartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Bohn v. LucksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.