Legal Opinion

United States v. One 1946 Mercury Sedan Automobile

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided October 29, 1951No. 1749PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOPER, Chief Judge.

Statement of the Case

The automobile in question was forfeited and condemned to the United States by a decree of this Court dated August 17, 1951, for violations of the Internal Revenue Laws set forth in the above numbered libel of information.

The Frank Graham Company filed a petition for remission of forfeiture under Section 3617(b) of Title 18 U.S.C.A.

On September 6, 1951, the petition for remission came on for a hearing on a stipu*959lation of facts, and after argument of counsel the case was submitted.

The stipulations approved by the Court are as follows:

1. That Frank…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach, Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. United States v. CIT CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  3. United States v. ONE HUDSON COUPE, 1938 MODEL, ETC.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
  4. United States v. One 1939 Model De Soto Coupe, Motor No. S6-27,687Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  5. United States v. Ford Truck, Motor & Serial No. BB18-3749639Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rosenfeld v. Continental Building Operating CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1955
  2. United States v. Frank Graham Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  3. McDaniel v. American Druggists Insurance Co. (In re National Buy-Rite, Inc.)District Court, D. Georgia · 1981
  4. United States v. One 1949 Chevrolet Pickup TruckDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1953
  5. United States v. One 1956 Plymouth 4-door SedanDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API