Legal Opinion
United States v. One 1939 Model De Soto Coupe, Motor No. S6-27,687
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 18, 1941No. 2172PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
The United States brought this action under Title 27 U.S.C.A. § 224, for the forfeiture of one 1939 model DeSoto automobile, which one D. A. (Dan) Myers purchased from the Carriger Motor Company at Tulsa, Oklahoma. The Commercial Investment Trust Corporation, claimant and appellee herein, is the purchaser of the conditional sales contract on which there was a balance due of $635.12, when the car was seized by the government on the 29th day of January, 1940. The claimant sought remission of the forfeiture under Title 27 U.S.C.A. § 40a. The trial court granted remission…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach, Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. CIT CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- United States v. ONE HUDSON COUPE, 1938 MODEL, ETC.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
- Universal Credit Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
- United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe CoachCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Interstate Securities Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
- Manufacturers Acceptance Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
- Aetna Finance Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- United States v. Drive New Cars, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- United States v. One 1955 Model Buick 4-Door Sedan AutomobileCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.