United States v. Ford Truck, Motor & Serial No. BB18-3749639
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Circuit Judge.
The petitioner, Pittsburgh Parking Garages, Inc., filed its petition for remission of forfeiture of a Ford truck. The United States filed an answer alleging that the petitioner had not complied with Section 204(b), Chapter 740, Act of August 27, 1935, 49 Stat. 878, 27 U.S.C.A. § 40a (b), which provides, inter alia, that “In any * * * proceeding [for forfeiture] the court shall not allow the claim of any claimant for remission * * * (3) if it appears that the interest asserted by the claimant arises out of or is in any way subject to any contract or agreement under which…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. CIT CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Pittsburgh Parking Garages, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- United States v. CoupéDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1938
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. One 1939 Model De Soto Coupe, Motor No. S6-27,687Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- Commercial Credit Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
- Manufacturers Acceptance Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
- United States v. Federal Credit Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- United States v. McArthurCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.