Legal Opinion

United States v. Ford Truck, Motor & Serial No. BB18-3749639

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 26, 1940No. 7472PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Circuit Judge.

The petitioner, Pittsburgh Parking Garages, Inc., filed its petition for remission of forfeiture of a Ford truck. The United States filed an answer alleging that the petitioner had not complied with Section 204(b), Chapter 740, Act of August 27, 1935, 49 Stat. 878, 27 U.S.C.A. § 40a (b), which provides, inter alia, that “In any * * * proceeding [for forfeiture] the court shall not allow the claim of any claimant for remission * * * (3) if it appears that the interest asserted by the claimant arises out of or is in any way subject to any contract or agreement under which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. CIT CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  2. Pittsburgh Parking Garages, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  3. United States v. CoupéDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1938

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. One 1939 Model De Soto Coupe, Motor No. S6-27,687Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  2. Commercial Credit Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
  3. Manufacturers Acceptance Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
  4. United States v. Federal Credit Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  5. United States v. McArthurCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API