Legal Opinion

United States v. ONE HUDSON COUPE, 1938 MODEL, ETC.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 11, 1940No. 4579PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOBIE, Circuit Judge.

A proceeding by the United States of America for the forfeiture of one Hudson Coupe, for violation of the internal revenue laws of the United States, 26 U.S.C.A. § 1441, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Code, § 3321, was instituted in the United States District Court. Commercial Credit Company, claimant and appellee, (hereinafter called the claimant), filed an answer to the libel of information, asserting a lien upon the automobile, and seeking a remission or mitigation of the forfeiture. After a hearing without a jury upon oral testimony and affidavits, the District Judge ordered…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach, Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. United States v. CIT CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  3. United States v. National Discount CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  4. CIT Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
  5. United States v. One Terraplane SedanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1938

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Universal Credit Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
  2. United States v. One 1939 Model De Soto Coupe, Motor No. S6-27,687Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  3. Interstate Securities Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  4. United States v. Federal Credit Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  5. United States v. One 1950 Lincoln Sedan, Motor No. 50lp 14278lCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API