United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach, Commercial Credit Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds
In each of these causes the District Court, proceeding under the “Liquor Law Repeal and Enforcement Act” *221of August 27, 1935 (c. 740, 49 Stat. 872, 878, Title 27 U. S. C. § 40a), mitigated the forfeiture of an automobile seized for unlawful transportation of distilled spirits upon, which the federal tax had not been paid. (One was seized December 3, 1936; the other, March 15, 1937.) The forfeiture was decreed in a proceeding based upon § 3450 R. S. (Title 26 U. S. C., § 1441). The Circuit Courts of Appeals rightly approved and their judgmehts must be affirmed.
The facts, undisputed, are…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- J. W. Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Farmers' & Mechanics' National Bank v. DearingSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Richbourg Motor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- United States v. CIT CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- United States v. MinceyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1918
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by300 opinions
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. United States Coin & CurrencySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. $191,910.00 in U.S. Currency, Bruce R. Morgan, Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. $38,000.00 in United States Currency, David English and Michael William English, Claimants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
295 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.