Legal Opinion

Clancy v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1969No. S. F. No. 22621PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of a disciplinary board of the State Bar that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for three years, on conditions of probation, including actual suspension for the first six months, and compliance with other terms of probation.

Facts-. Petitioner, now 36 years of age, was admitted to practice in this state in 1961. He was charged in a notice to show cause with professional misconduct in violation of his oath and duties as an attorney at law (Bus. & Prof. Code, *142§§ 6103, 6067, 6068) and the commission of acts involving moral…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re RothrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Marsh v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Best v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. McKinney v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Resner v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State Bar of Nevada v. ClaiborneNevada Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Giovanazzi v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Demain v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API