Lindenbaum v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is a proceeding to review the recommendation of the Board of Governors of The State Bar that petitioner be suspended for the period of six months.
Petitioner was charged with the violation of his oath and duties as an attorney and the commission of acts involving moral turpitude within the meaning of sections 6103 and 6106 of the Business and Professions Code. He made answer to the charges and at the hearings before the local administrative committee, both the complainants and the petitioner testified. From the evidence, both oral and documentary, introduced at its hearings, the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. BeggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- In Re CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Jacobs v. the State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Lantz v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Hildebrand v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Arden v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Bluestein v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Copren v. State Bar of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1947
- Academy of California Optometrists, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.