Legal Opinion
Williams v. Johnson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 2, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2006-2076PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Following a three-day trial, a jury in this Court found that Defendant, the District of Columbia, retaliated against Plaintiff Christina Conyers Williams in violation of the District of Columbia Whistleblower Protection Act (the “DC-WPA”) and awarded Plaintiff $300,000 in damages. Defendant responded by filing a [204] Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or, in the Alternative, for a New Trial (“Motion for Judgment”), contending that it is entitled to relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b) because the evidence presented at…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Red Mendoza v. Borden, Inc., D.B.A. Borden's DairyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Ortiz v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Act Up!/Portland v. BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Lawrence D. Mungin v. Katten Muchin & Zavis, A/K/A Katten Muchin Zavis & Weitzman, F/d/b/a Katten Muchin Zavis & DombroffCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Gerry Scott v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Christina Williams v. Robert JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Beyene v. Washington Hilton LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Coleman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Nessar v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Williams v. JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.