Legal Opinion
Lawrence D. Mungin v. Katten Muchin & Zavis, A/K/A Katten Muchin Zavis & Weitzman, F/d/b/a Katten Muchin Zavis & Dombroff
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 8, 1997No. 96-7152PublishedCited by 237 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH.
Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by Chief Judge HARRY T. EDWARDS.
RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge:
In July 1994, Mark Dombroff left the law firm that bore his name — Katten Muchin Za-vis & Dombroff — the Washington, D.C., branch of Chicago’s Katten Muchin & Zavis. Principally because of Dombroffs departure, defections and terminations reduced the number of lawyers in the D.C. office from 42 to 14. Lawrence Mungin, an associate in the D.C. office, was among the lawyers who left the firm. He departed on July 25, 1994.
In…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by237 opinions
- Baloch v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Edward E. ERCEGOVICH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Brown, Regina C. v. Brody, Kenneth D.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- George, Diane v. Leavitt, MichaelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Waterhouse v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
232 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.