Legal Opinion
City & County of San Francisco v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board
California Supreme Court
Decided August 5, 1970No. S.F. 22673; S.F. 22674; S.F. 22675PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McCOMB, J.
These three cases have been consolidated for review of awards of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board to determine a common question of law: Does the payment of an industrial disability retirement allowance more than one year from the date of injury and from the last furnishing of medical care, constitute the payment of “compensation” within the meaning of section 3207 of the Labor Code so as to toll the statute of limitations for filing proceedings to collect benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation and Insurance Act (Lab. Code, § 3201 et seq.).
Claimants, a fireman and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Healy v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- City of Los Angeles v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Colonial Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- City of Costa Mesa v. McKenzieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Symington v. City of AlbanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Kaiser Foundation Hosp. v. WORKERS'COMP. APPEALS BD.California Supreme Court · 1977
- Lyons v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Ott v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.