Legal Opinion
City of Costa Mesa v. McKenzie
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 22, 1973No. Civ. 12096PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAMURA, J.
This is an action for declaratory relief by the City of Costa Mesa against defendant McKenzie, a retired city employee, for a judicial declaration respecting the city’s obligation to pay a disability retirement allowance under city Ordinance No. 64-45. The case was tried on an agreed statement of facts and resulted in a judgment decreeing that McKenzie is entitled to monthly disability benefits under the ordinance in the amount of $1,109 in addition to $664.51 per month under the city’s retirement plan and $227.50 per month in workmen’s compensation benefits for a total sum…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Rivera v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Bush v. BrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- DeYoung v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Valdes v. CoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Terminal Plaza Corp. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Maciejewski v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- San Diego Union v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.