Legal Opinion

Ott v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 6, 1981No. Civ. 5951PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ZENOVICH, J.

This petition for writ of review challenges the propriety of a decision allowing a credit against permanent disability indemnity to respondent Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company for sums paid under its employee benefit plan. For reasons to be explained, we find that the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board incorrectly allowed the credit, and we annul the order.

Petitioner Lunette Ott (hereinafter Ott) was employed with respondent Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company (hereinafter Pacific Telephone) as a marketing representative. On January 15, 1970, she was struck by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ogdon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Huston v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Herrera v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Russell v. Bankers Life Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. City & County of San Francisco v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Williams v. WraxallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Thomas v. LuskCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Gamble v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Los Angeles Unified School District v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API