Legal Opinion

St. Clair v. McAlister

California Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1932No. Docket No. L.A. 13607PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action for damages for personal interest.

The plaintiff’s injuries were the result of a collision between a passenger bus operated by the defendant company and a Ford automobile operated by Raymond P. McAlister, a minor. The defendants, G. N. McAlister and Beatrix McAlister, are husband and wife and are the parents of the minor. The parents were sued because of the negligence imputed to them upon their assumption of liability in the issuance of an operator’s license to the minor son pursuant to the provisions of the California Vehicle…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Scarborough v. UrgoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. McCurrie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Connor v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Osgood v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Kilgore v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Hardin v. San Jose City Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Armstrong v. WallaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Gritsch v. Pickwick Stages SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Godfrey v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API