Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Wallace

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 22, 1935No. Civ. 5170PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

This action was brought by plaintiffs, husband and wife, against Carl T. Wallace, a physician and surgeon, and Sisters of St. Joseph of Orange, a corporation, operating a hospital, for injuries alleged to have been sustained by Maxine Armstrong as the result of the alleged negligence of Dr. Wallace and Sisters of St. Joseph of Orange, a corporation, in the failure to remove a laparotomy sponge from the abdominal cavity of Mrs. Armstrong, upon the completion of a Caesarean operation.

After a trial before a jury, a verdict was returned in favor of both defendants and against plaintiffs.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Michener v. HuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Cassady v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  3. Hesler v. California Hospital Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Marovich v. Central California Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Connor v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1922

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Silva v. Providence Hospital of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Ales v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Whetstine v. MoravecSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API