Legal Opinion
United States v. Oregon
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided October 7, 1988No. Civ. No. 68-513-MAPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
(Plan)
MARSH, District Judge.
The State of Oregon, the State of Washington, the United States, the Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon, the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation, the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation and the Nez Perce Tribe move for an order approving a Columbia River Fish Management Plan (hereinafter “1988 Plan” or “the Plan”). The State of Idaho and the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes object to its adoption. Amicus curiae briefs are submitted from the Northwest Gillnetters Association and Columbia River…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Puyallup Tribe v. Department of Game of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- William Inglis & Sons Baking Co., a Corporation v. Itt Continental Baking Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- First Brands Corporation v. Fred Meyer, Inc. And Basf Wyandotte CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Oakland Tribune, Inc. v. Chronicle Publishing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Makah Indian Tribe v. C. William VerityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. State Of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Idaho Department of Fish & Game v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1994
- Pacific Northwest Generating Cooperative v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.