Legal Opinion
United States v. Oregon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 27, 1990No. Nos. 88-4311, 88-4316 and 88-4347PublishedCited by 171 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
These appeals concern the Oregon district court’s approval of a plan allocating the harvest of Columbia River salmon and steelhead. The State of Idaho and the Shoshone-Bannock tribes challenge the allocation of fish that reach Idaho. They opposed the plan at the time of the district court’s approval hearings, but the court approved the plan over their objections. The Makah, an ocean fishing tribe, challenge the quota allocated to the ocean fishery. They sought to intervene in the suit, but their motion was denied. Each party *579appeals the adverse rulings affecting it. We…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Local Number 93, International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by171 opinions
- Michigan State Afl-Cio v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Alisal Water Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Maynard v. City of San JoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Molski v. GleichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Dr. Leo F. Kenneally v. Dan LungrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
166 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.