Legal Opinion
Idaho Department of Fish & Game v. National Marine Fisheries Service
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided March 28, 1994No. Civ. 92-973-MA (Lead), 93-1420-MA and 93-1603-MAPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARSH, District Judge.
The Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) filed this suit against the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) challenging defendants’ actions in operating the Federal Columbia River Power System (FCRPS) in 1993. IDFG claims that defendants have violated the Endangered Species Act (ESA), 16 U.S.C. § 1536, by: (1) failing to insure that FCRPS operations are not likely to jeopardize listed species; (2) omitting consideration of all relevant scientific factors; (3) failing to include…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Alfred L. Snapp & Son, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Ex Rel. BarezSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Northwest Motorcycle Ass'n v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians v. United States Department of the Navy James Webb, as Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Sohappy v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1969
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- National Wildlife Federation v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- National Wildlife Federation v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Ramsey v. KantorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Ramsey v. KantorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- National Wildlife Federation v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.