Legal Opinion
Pacific Northwest Generating Cooperative v. Brown
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided April 1, 1993No. Civ. Nos. 92-973-MA, 92-1260-MA and 92-1264-MAPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1483OPINION
MARSH, District Judge.
Plaintiffs filed these actions claiming that defendants violated the Endangered Species Act (ESA) with respect to actions taken affecting recently listed salmon species. The linchpin of plaintiffs’ dispute with defendants relates to the technical and economic impact of defendants’ decision to augment flows over dams in an effort to improve juvenile fish migration: plaintiffs submit opinions from biologists declaring that flow augmentation has an insignificant impact upon the protection of the listed salmon species, while argu: ing that these measures contribute to…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Japan Whaling Ass'n v. American Cetacean SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Arizona Cattle Growers' Ass'n v. United States Fish & WildlifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Tempest Fisheries v. LockeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Arizona Cattle Growers' Association v. United States Fish And WildlifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Idaho Department of Fish & Game v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1994
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority v. SalazarDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.