Legal Opinion

Puyallup Tribe v. Department of Game of Wash.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 27, 1968No. 247PublishedCited by 249 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

These cases present a question of public importance which involves in the first place a construction of the Treaty of Medicine Creek made with the Puyallup and Nisqually Indians in 1854 (10 Stat. 1132) and secondly the constitutionality of certain conservation measures adopted by the State of Washington allegedly impinging on those treaty rights.

These suits were brought by respondents in the state court against the Indians for declaratory relief and for an injunction. The trial court held for respondents and with exceptions not relevant to our problem the Supreme Court affirmed in part and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Murdock v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. United States v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by249 opinions

  1. Mescalero Apache Tribe v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Puyallup Tribe, Inc. v. Department of Game of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. AntelopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Antoine v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

244 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API