Legal Opinion

In Re Francis S. Gurley

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided June 15, 1994No. 94-1025PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

Francis S. Gurley appeals the decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, 1 affirming the Examiner’s rejection of all of the claims of application Serial No. 07/524,373. The Board determined that these claims are unpatentable for obviousness in terms of 35 U.S.C. § 103, in view of Japanese Patent Specification No. 56-76591 (Yamaguchi) and the prior art set forth in Gurley’s specification.

We agree that the prior art constituted a prima facie case of obviousness, placing on Mr. Gurley the burden of coming forward with evidence and argument in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Garlock, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. In Re Frank N. Piasecki and Donald N. MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. In re SponnobleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  5. Application of Marion J. CaldwellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  2. Crocs, Inc. v. International Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  3. Ormco Corporation v. Align TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  4. Winner International Royalty Corporation v. Ching-Rong WangCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  5. Medichem, S.A. v. Rolabo, S.L.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API