Legal Opinion
Application of Marion J. Caldwell
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 28, 1963No. Patent Appeal 6976PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICH, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claims 1-8 in appellant’s patent application, Ser. No. 764,262, filed September 30, 1958, for “Animal Feeds Containing Aspirin.” Claims 9-11, directed to such feeds and giving percentage ranges for the propor*255tion of aspirin in the feed (0.002% to 0.05%), stand allowed.
The Invention
Claims 1-4 were also directed to feed but were withdrawn from the appeal at the oral argument. As to them, the appeal is dismissed. This leaves for our consideration only claims 5-8 which are directed to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bayer Co. v. United Drug Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1921
- Hutzler Bros. v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- Application of ArbeitCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- Procter & Gamble Mfg. Co. v. Refining, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
- Locklin v. Switzer BrothersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Exxon Research and Engineering Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- In Re Francis S. GurleyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Application of John Nicholson Gardner, Anthony Maitland Roe and George Lawrence WilleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Application of Frank E. HalleckCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- In re WatsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.