Legal Opinion
Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 7, 2017No. 2017-1475PublishedCited by 164 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. and BRP U.S. Inc. (collectively, “BRP”) appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida’s denial of judgment as a matter of law that the asserted claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,568,969 (“’969 patent”) and 6,793,-545 (“’545 patent”) would have been obvious, that Arctic Cat Inc. (“Arctic Cat”) failed to mark patented products, that the jury’s royalty award was based on improper expert testimony, and that BRP did not willfully infringe the asserted claims. BRP also appeals the district court’s decision to…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by164 opinions
- Sri Int'l, Inc. v. Cisco Sys., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Xy, LLC v. Trans Ova Genetics, L.C.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Packet Intelligence LLC v. Netscout Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Forest Laboratories, LLC v. Sigmapharm Laboratories, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- University of California v. Broad Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
159 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.