Legal Opinion
United States v. Adams
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 21, 1966No. 55PublishedCited by 535 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark
This is a companion case to No. 11, Graham v. John Deere Co., decided this day along with Nos. 37 and 43, Calmar, Inc. v. Cook Chemical Co. and Colgate-Palmolive Co. v. Cook Chemical Co. The United States seeks review of a judgment of the Court of Claims, holding valid and infringed a patent on a wet battery issued to Adams. This suit under 28 U. S. C. § 1498 (1964 ed.) was brought by Adams and others holding an interest in the patent against the Government charging both infringement and breach of an implied contract to pay compensation for the use of the invention. The Government challenged…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. Crescent Amusement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Smith v. SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by535 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Scimed Life Systems, Inc. v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
530 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.