Legal Opinion
Medichem, S.A. v. Rolabo, S.L.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 3, 2006No. 2005-1179PublishedCited by 112 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
This is the second round of a protracted litigation to establish priority of invention between Stampa et al.’s U.S. Patent No. 6,084,100 (“the ’100 patent”), assigned to Medichem, S.A. (“Medichem”), and Jackson’s U.S. Patent No. 6,093,827 (“the ’827 patent”), assigned to Rolabo, ,S.L. (“Rola-bo”). In the first round, appealed to this court, we remanded to the district court, requiring it to establish an interference-in-fact under 35 U.S.C. § 291 before determining priority. Medichem, S.A. v. Rolabo, S.L., 353 F.3d 928 (Fed.Cir.2003) (‘Medichem II”). Rolabo now appeals…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Richard C. Price v. Dale R. SymsekCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Eli Lilly and Company v. Aradigm Corporation, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Dr. Sakharam D. Mahurkar v. C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol Inc. And Bard Access Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by112 opinions
- Pfizer, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Pharmasterm Therapeutics, Inc. v. Viacell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Ormco Corporation v. Align TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Martek Biosciences Corp. v. Nutrinova, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.