Legal Opinion

State v. Stewart

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 2006No. 20050079, 20050080, 20050081, 20050082, 20050083, 20050084, 20050085, 20050086PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Reed James Stewart appeals from criminal judgments entered after a jury found him guilty of felony possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute, two counts of felony possession of stolen property, two counts of felony possession of drug paraphernalia, two counts of felony possession of prescription drugs with intent to deliver, and misdemeanor possession of drug paraphernalia. We affirm the district court’s judgments.

I

[¶ 2] Stewart was suspected of numerous crimes involving methamphetamine. The district court issued a search warrant after police obtained…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. State v. MischeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. ThielingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. HageNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. RothNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. KieperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. EbelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. PattersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. LundeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Grand Forks Homes, Inc. v. State of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API