Legal Opinion

State v. Patterson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 2014No. 20140048PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Darrius Cortez Patterson appeals from a criminal judgment after a jury found him guilty of delivery of cocaine within 1000 feet of a school. Patterson argues the district court should have declared a mistrial because testimony given by a confidential informant and statements made by the State during opening and closing arguments affected his right to a fair trial amounting to obvious error under N.D.R.Crim.P. 52(b). We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] On September 9, 2011, Patterson was the subject of a controlled drug buy conducted by Fargo Police Department using a confidential…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. State v. OlanderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. ErickstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. MickoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. HernandezNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. PembertonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. ChatmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. WangstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. LandrusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API