State v. Patterson
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Darrius Cortez Patterson appeals from a criminal judgment after a jury found him guilty of delivery of cocaine within 1000 feet of a school. Patterson argues the district court should have declared a mistrial because testimony given by a confidential informant and statements made by the State during opening and closing arguments affected his right to a fair trial amounting to obvious error under N.D.R.Crim.P. 52(b). We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] On September 9, 2011, Patterson was the subject of a controlled drug buy conducted by Fargo Police Department using a confidential…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- State v. OlanderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. ErickstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. MickoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. HernandezNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. PembertonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. ChatmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. WangstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. LandrusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.