Legal Opinion

Clark v. Berlin Realty Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 20, 1917No. Civ. No. 2206PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. Charles Wellborn, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Judgment in this action was for the plaintiff. The appeal is taken from the judgment and from an order denying the motion made by the defendant for a new trial. Plaintiff, as assignee of the Merchants’ National Bank of Los Angeles, brought this action for recovery against the defendant on account of an indebtedness created by the Berlin Dye Works & Laundry Company, a corporation, of which latter corporation defendant was at certain times material herein a stockholder and the owner of 209,535 shares of stock. The total capital of the Berlin Dye Works & Laundry Company was represented by three…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. London & San Francisco Bank, Ltd. v. ParrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Gnarini v. Swiss American BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Treweek v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Haskell v. HaskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Green v. CliffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Estate of DargieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Anglo-California Trust Co. v. WallaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  3. Tristam v. MarquesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Kaysser v. McNaughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. First National Bank v. CorcoranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API