Kaysser v. McNaughton
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
The main question presented on this appeal is whether stockholders in a corporation are proportionately liable for the debts incurred by the corporation between November 4, 1930 (the date of the repeal of article XII, section 3, of the Constitution) and August 14, 1931 (the effective date of the repeal by the legislature of sec. 322, Civ. Code). Stated another way, did the repeal of the constitutional provision repeal the provision of the Civil Code dealing with the same subject?
The question is presented on the following state of facts. Appellant, as assignee of certain claims against the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Coombes v. GetzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- French v. TeschemakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Young v. RosenbaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Ellsworth v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Sonoma Valley Bank v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Rainey v. MichelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Knouse v. NimocksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Anglo California National Bank v. KleinNew York Supreme Court · 1936
- Ventura Co. v. CraemerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.