Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Corcoran

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 7, 1930No. Docket No. 279PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, Acting P. J.

Appellant filed two actions in the court below to recover judgments on two checks. One was dated August 15, 1927, drawn by respondent, by O. C. Woodworth his agent, upon the Franklin Trust & Savings Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, a banking corporation, to E. Y. Foley, in the sum of $2,179.80. The other check was identical in form, except that it was dated August 16, 1927, and was drawn for the sum of $1,500. The two cases were tried together, and while there are two judgments from which appeals were taken, they are presented here upon a single record. As the facts, except as we have…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. London & San Francisco Bank, Ltd. v. ParrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Gnarini v. Swiss American BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Bonestell v. BowieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Clark v. Berlin Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
  5. Gnarini v. Banca Svizzera AmericanaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Washington Lumber & Millwork Co. v. McGuireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Goodfellow v. GoodfellowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. McAuley v. Morris Plan BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
  4. Bank of America v. Universal Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. State v. MerklingerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API