Legal Opinion

Haskell v. Haskell

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1880No. 6,102PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, in the Nineteenth District Court, City and County of San Francisco. Wheeler, J. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Department No. 2, Sharpstein, J.;

The plaintiff, for a first cause of action, alleges that the defendant, for more than ten years next preceding the commencement of this action, was guilty of extreme cruelty toward her; and then proceeds to detail at great length a series of acts, which, if proved, would support a finding of adultery. Immediately following this narrative, in the same count, is an allegation “ in further support of said charge of extreme cruelty,” as the pleader styles it, “ that for more than ten years past, and until now, defendant has been addicted to the use of intoxicating…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barlow v. BurnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  2. McAbee v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Lord v. GarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Van Camp v. Van CampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Ring v. RingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Treweek v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Lambert v. Southern Counties Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1959

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API