Legal Opinion
London & San Francisco Bank, Ltd. v. Parrott
California Supreme Court
Decided July 28, 1899No. S. F. No. 1167PublishedCited by 40 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The defendants in the above-entitled cause (with others) executed and delivered to the plaintiff, September 30, 1891, the following instrument:
“To the London and San Francisco Bank, Lt’d, San Francisco, California:
“You will please give credit to.the Capitol Packing Company for a sum of money in United States gold coin not exceeding the amount of one hundred thousand ($100,000) dollars; and as said packing company contemplates a course of future dealing with you, you will please continue the said credit, or, if it should be reduced or satisfied by payments made by said packing company, renew…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Smith v. . MollesonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Lawrence v. McCalmontSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- Bell v. BruenSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
- National Mahaiwe Bank v. PeckMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- Gates v. . McKeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Salazar v. EastinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Sather Banking Co. v. Arthur R. Briggs Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Fowler v. COURTEMANCHEOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- First National Bank of Redlands v. BowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Boothe v. Farmers & Traders Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1908
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.