In Re Estate of Treat
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco directing the payment of an alleged arrearage under a prior order, granting a family allowance. Thomas F. Graham, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an appeal by certain creditors of the estate of deceased and the administrators with the will annexed from an order of the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco directing said administrators to pay an alleged arrearage under a prior order of said court, made subsequent to the return and filing of the inventory in said estate, granting a family allowance to the widow of deceased.
There is no controversy as to the material facts, which are as follows: Deceased died testate, and his will was admitted to probate on December 8, 1906. The inventory and appraisement of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ruggles v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- In re estate of LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Dougherty v. DoughertyMontana Supreme Court · 1906
- Estate of NolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Estate of Walkerley v. WalkerleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Goulart v. GoulartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- In Re the Estate of NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Rosborough v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Estate of BosellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Buck v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.