Legal Opinion

Estate of Nolan

California Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1904No. S.F. No. 3729PublishedCited by 24 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion. Frank J. Fallon, and Mullany, Grant & Cushing, for Appellants. James G. Maguire, and Edgar D. Peixotto, for Respondents.

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, C.

Appeal from order settling account of Mary Nolan as administratrix of the estate of James Nolan, deceased. The item of six hundred and twenty-five dollars, being the amount of family allowance for twenty-five months at twenty-five dollars per month, paid by the administratrix to herself, is the subject of contest.

Mary Nolan filed a petition in the superior court praying for letters of administration upon the estate of James Nolan, deceased, in which she alleged that she was the widow of said deceased. After notice given, an order was made appointing her administratrix of the said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Ruggles v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Lynch v. RooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Quirk v. RooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Thompson v. StaackeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. DoughertyMontana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Estate of BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. McQuarrie v. KuttlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. In Re the Estate of NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Estate of Harrington v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API