In Re the Estate of Nelson
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from an order of the Superior Court of Alameda County directing the payment of accrued family allowance, and reducing the amount of the monthly allowance for the future. F. B. Ogden, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The will of Charles Nelson, deceased, was admitted to prohate on the twenty-eighth day of June, 1909, and letters testamentary issued to James Tyson and Margaret Bresse. On August 30, 1909, an inventory and appraisement was filed, showing assets of the estate appraised at $586,370.13. Helena Stind Nelson, the widow of the decedent, thereafter filed a petition for the setting apart of exempt property and for a family allowance, and, on October 13, 1909, the court made an order setting aside for her use certain property appraised at one thousand and eighty-five dollars, and giving her an…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In re the Estate of StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Ruggles v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- In re estate of LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- In Re Estate of BumpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Estate of NolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Stiebel v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Estate of Edward A. Cunha, Deceased, Bank of America, National Trust and Savings Association v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Hutchinson v. DowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Estate of FultonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Estate of SecordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.