Legal Opinion

Estate of Boselly

California Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1918No. S. F. No. 8738PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

Pending the administration of the estate of Frederic J ames Boselly, and after the return of the inventory, the court, on June 11, 1915, made an order, under section 1466 of the Code of Civil Procedure, granting the widow an allowance of $350 per month until the final distribution of the estate. On April 28, 1916, Violet Aline Holbo, a daughter of the decedent, and one of the beneficiaries under his will, filed a petition for the termination of the allowance granted by the order of June 11, 1915. The court set the matter for hearing*'1 and directed that notice be given the widow by posting…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. In Re Estate of TreatCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Ford v. FordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Keck v. KeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Hutchinson v. DowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Estate of HoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Rosborough v. HoustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Estate of MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API