Legal Opinion

Kellow v. Lane

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 14, 1951No. Civ. No. 17818PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARTLETT, J. pro tem.

This is an appeal from an order made on December 19, 1940, denying appellant’s motion for an order directing issuance of a writ of execution after five years from the date of the judgment under the provisions of section 685 of the Code of Civil Procedure and also from an order made January 13, 1950, denying a motion made by appellant to vacate and set aside its order of December 16, 1949, and for leave to renew or reconsider the original motion.

The judgment herein was entered on May 2, 1938. The notice of motion for an order directing issuance of execution on the judgment…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Litvinuk v. LitvinukCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Mather v. MatherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Butcher v. BrouwerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Di Corpo v. Di CorpoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Alpers v. BlissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ponce ex rel. Monzón González v. F. Badrena e Hijos, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1952
  2. Shapiro v. CahillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Urland v. FrenchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Pak v. PakSuperior Court of Guam · 2025
  5. Ponce v. F. Badrena e Hijos, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API