Legal Opinion

Urland v. French

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 3, 1956No. Civ. 21499PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment notwithstanding the verdict rendered in favor of defendant Los Angeles Transit Lines, in an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident.

The action was originally filed against Fred French, Harvey French, Marie Elizabeth Whitmore and Los Angeles Transit Lines. Fred and Harvey French and their liability insurance carrier, through a covenant not to sue, settled with appellant by payment of $30,000, although the paying parties denied any liability and appellant asserted liability on the part of respondent.

Th…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hunt v. United Bank & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Estate of CasparCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Taylor v. Oakland Scavenger Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Gray v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Hilyar v. Union Ice Co.California Supreme Court · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Trammell v. Western Union Telegraph Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Spillman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Groves v. Puscizna CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API