Legal Opinion
State v. Hansen
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided June 9, 1994No. 20045PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MeDEVITT, Chief Justice.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
On September 28,1990, Russell A. Hansen (“Hansen”) and Jeff McAdam (“McAdam”) were indicted on charges of racketeering, stemming from their participation in the growing and processing of marijuana around Dworshak Reservoir in 1988 and 1989. McAdam pled guilty to the charge on October 25, 1991. On January 6, 1992, Hansen moved to dismiss the indictment, arguing that the facts alleged are not sufficient to support a conviction on the charge of racketeering. Hansen’s motion was supported by an affidavit, in which Hansen admitted the essential facts the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
- United States v. RiccobeneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- State v. BroadheadIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- United States v. KragnessCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. CobbIdaho Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- State v. HartIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. KillingerIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. HammersleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.